Search Penny Hill Press

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Navy Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN) Homeporting at Mayport: Background and Issues for Congress

Ronald O'Rourke
Specialist in Naval Affairs

The Navys proposed FY2013 budget defers the Navys plan to homeport a nuclear-powered  aircraft carrier (CVN) at Mayport, FL. The Navys proposed FY2013 budget and the FY2013- FY2017 Future Years Defense Plan (FYDP) contain no funding for Military Construction  (MilCon) projects required to homeport a CVN at Mayport. The Navy states: “Although the FY  2013 budget does not contain a construction project supporting the homeporting of a CVN in  Mayport, FL, the Department [of the Navy] is committed to the requirement and policy to  strategically disperse CVNs on each coast. This is a deferral at this time due to fiscal constraints.”

The Navys five Atlantic Fleet CVNs are all homeported at Norfolk, VA. The Navy wants to  establish a second Atlantic Fleet CVN home port by homeporting a CVN at Mayport. Prior to the submission of the FY2013 budget, Navy plans called for having Mayport ready to homeport a  CVN in 2019. Transferring a CVN from Norfolk to Mayport would shift from Norfolk to  Mayport the local economic activity associated with homeporting a CVN, which some sources  estimate as being worth hundreds of millions of dollars per year.  

The Navys desire to homeport a CVN at Mayport is an issue of strong interest to certain  Members of Congress from Florida and Virginia. Certain Members of Congress from Florida  have expressed support for the Navys desire to homeport a CVN at Mayport, arguing (as have  DOD and the Navy) that the benefits in terms of mitigating risks to the Navys Atlantic Fleet  CVNs are worth the costs associated with moving a CVN to Mayport. Certain Members of  Congress from Virginia have expressed skepticism regarding, or opposition to, the Navys desire to homeport a CVN at Mayport, arguing that the benefits in terms of mitigating risks to the  Navys Atlantic Fleet CVNs are questionable or uncertain, and that the funding needed to Ns are questionable or uncertain, and that the funding needed to  implement the proposal could achieve greater benefits if it were spent on other Navy priorities.



Date of Report: February 21, 2012
Number of Pages: 79
Order Number: R40248
Price: $29.95

Follow us on TWITTER at http://www.twitter.com/alertsPHP or #CRSreports


Document available via e-mail as a pdf file or in paper form.
To order, e-mail Penny Hill Press or call us at 301-253-0881. Provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.